Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

advertise with us
Sponsored by
Read more about on-line and in print,
advertising or call 01723 363636 now.
 
 
Thursday, 8th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scarborough Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Building society: what about all the 'passengers'?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 November 2008
IS the takeover of Scarborough Building Society a marriage of convenience or a shotgun wedding?
Despite the description by John Carrier, Chief Executive of Scarborough Building Society, of the proposed merger, a merger it does not appear to be.

It is a takeover; unless Mr Carrier may be of the opinion that it is a reverse takeover, backing
a society in financial difficulties into financially sound Skipton, the sixth largest society.

Following the takeover, the Skipton will leap an unimpressive one notch up the league table, to fifth place.

I have always had the greatest respect for John Goodfellow, Chief Executive of the Skipton, who will retire at the end of the year, with a feather in his cap, with the satisfaction of knowing that as captain of his ship, he has steered his ship to success. But Mr Carrier, on retirement at the end of the year, will be off the ship, before crew and passengers, with presumably a full and substantial benefits package.

The passengers will undoubtedly survive, but I do not share the same optimism for the crew who will remain on the bridge.

I believe that there may be many casualties, despite the assurance that there will be none.

The two organisations do have a lot in common and have many similar areas of operations, particularly subsidiary operations. History suggests that in this situation it is not economical for two entities to carry on performing the same function.

History also suggests that job losses are a certainty and that takeovers and/or mergers do not create employment.

It is a real pity for the people of Scarborough that they will lose a piece of history.

I cannot agree that takeover of the Scarborough Building Society is as a result of turmoil of the markets. A captain should be both accountable and responsible and it is a real pity that, in my opinion, he may be best remembered for ending 162 years of history.

Andrew J Sizer

Director

The Foremost Group

Victoria Road, Scarborough



The full article contains 344 words and appears in Scarborough Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 November 2008 9:50 AM
  • Source: Scarborough Evening News
  • Location: Scarborough
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.